Skip to Navigation Skip to Content
Decorative woodsy background

Is There a Reappearing Rabbit Trick?

NPR produced a nice piece recently on New England cottontail restoration efforts in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. You can listen and/or read a transcript here.

For those not familiar with this critter, the NE cottontail’s story is a quirky one. Used to be that this was our New England rabbit (it was your rabbit in New York, too). But by the latter half of the 20th century, it was in decline. The reason given was “habitat destruction,” which in urban circles is often taken to mean that profit-minded humans cut down the forest. But, in fact, the trees are to blame here, or, I suppose, humans are to blame for not clearcutting them more intensely. The NE cottontail thrives in brushy, thick cover but not so well elsewhere. So as the forest came back, the rabbits declined.

Where we can justifiably point the finger at ourselves is in the fact that we humans introduced the Eastern cottontail rabbit to the region, which further compounded the NE cottontail’s problems (you can decide for yourself whether this was a bad thing). In a remarkably short time the new bunny took over. In Vermont, for example, Eastern cottontails were first reported in the 1960s – they’d hopped up from the Hudson valley – and by 1971 the NE cottontail was suspected to have been extirpated from the state. The Easterns, which look nearly identical to the New Englands, are slightly larger and have a wider range of vision, which allow them to outcompete the smaller, native rabbits.

Where things get complex is when we consider what to do about the remaining pockets of New England cottontails that exist in the region. Today you can find them in very small numbers in parts of southern New Hampshire and Maine, eastern Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, and on Cape Cod. Some state wildlife management folks I’ve spoken to about the rabbit speak of a strange dance in which they’re trying to protect the species while at the same time trying to fend off a federal endangered species listing, which, despite its good intention, can be a bad thing. Yes, a federal listing would mean federal money, but the strings that come with it – the hunting ban on all rabbits (remember, it’s almost impossible to tell the two species apart at a glance), the effects on municipal planning, the politically mandated clearcuts – could be a nightmare.

So what do you think? Would a federal listing be good or a bad? Is it immoral to suggest that if the introduced eastern cottontails look the same, act the same, and work better in our current landscape, that we should just let the native ones go extinct? Have you been involved in NE cottontail restoration work, and if so, what are some of the struggles or successes you’ve had?

For my part, I see this as a great opportunity for landowners to do something to help a species that’s really in trouble. I think it’s fair to be wary of government intervention in this matter, but individual landowners are unencumbered by bureaucratic strings. If you live in an area with a refugee New England cottontail population, consider an early-successional patch cut to help them out. More information can be found at: http://extension.unh.edu/resources/files/Resource001135_Rep1417.pdf

Discussion *

Dec 14, 2010

Apropos of all this… a press release from the Massachusetts DFW came in today asking for help in a NE cottontail survey:

Beginning this winter, the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (DFW) will be conducting a statewide survey of cottontail rabbits to assess the distribution and population of New England cottontails (Sylvilagus transitionalis), the only cottontail rabbit species native to the northeastern United States and rarely seen. Two kinds of cottontail rabbits are found in Massachusetts, the common non-native Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) and the New England cottontail. Division biologists are asking for the help of hunters, highway department workers, animal control officers, and other interested citizens across the state to provide DFW with cottontail carcasses or intact cottontail skulls for the survey.

Carcasses or intact cottontail heads should be placed in a plastic bag and frozen until they can be dropped off at a DFW District Office, DFW hatchery, or DFW’s Field Headquarters in Westborough. Please include a note with contact information, date of collection and detailed location information such as town, street or land parcel. A marked topographic map or GPS coordinates are ideal, but any detailed location information will greatly aid biologists.

dave mance
Dec 13, 2010

When I was a young seasonal field biologist I worked for Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, conducting some of the first research on cottontails in southern Maine (in 1998). At that time there was still a 6 a day bag limit! Hard to believe now. Having come and gone from my native Maine several times over the last decade or more I’ve been watching this issue with great interest. Rather than a species focus it would be most useful to discuss what’s necessary to benefit an entire suite of early successional species, including the NE cottontail, the American Woodcock, the Ruffed Grouse, golden-winged warblers, willow flycatchers, among others. This will require a new management paradigm that many New Englanders are likely unfamiliar with (your recent article on Woodcock captured this nicely). I encourage landowners to think about developing early successional habitat on their property through programs like the New England-New York Forestry Initiative. According to the NRCS “$2,000,000 in federal funding through the Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP) is available to assist Maine forest land owners with forest land planning and management under the New England-New York Forestry Initiative.” http://www.me.nrcs.usda.gov/news/News_2011ForestryInitiativeSignup.html
Thanks for sparking such good discussions, NW!

Deborah Perkins
Dec 10, 2010

This comment came in as a Letter to the Editor.

Great article, and I enjoyed following the link.  As a New England Cottontail Rabbit Volunteer in NH, I can describe the shrublands habitat of the rabbit, home to an incredible array of flora and fauna, to some as interesting as the forests of New England.  I have been very interested to learn from UNH Cooperative Extension’s Emma Carcagno that recent estimates relate to forestry practices, land conservation and habitat restoration:  Every six acres of protected (or reclaimed) shrublands gives a native New England ecosystem an opportunity to rebound from decades of habitat destruction, and an endangered species has a chance to show its fuzzy face.

Mila Paul

Emily Rowe
Dec 06, 2010

I’m a graduate student at UNH who has been studying this rabbit for the past two years. In response to Barbara’s question about which rabbit species she has, they are almost impossible to tell apart unless you have them in your hands, and even then it’s pretty tricky. However, Lyme is so far north that you are more likely to have snowshoe hares than either cottontail species. The easiest way to tell is that hares turn white in winter. If you see your rabbits in the middle of winter and they are still brown, you might have a cottontail. In that case, you should call the Fish and Game Department with your sighting.

Toni Weidman
Dec 05, 2010

I’m a strong supporter of endangered and threatened species (and the Endangered Species Act), but I have mixed feelings about the NE cottontail because much of its decline is attributable to the reversion of pasture to forest in Maine.  So, its higher populations in the past was larger an artifact of human development.  On the other hand, every species (and subspecies) is important in terms of its contribution of genetic diversity and its place on Earth, so I hate to see it the NE cottontail disappear. So, I guess that makes me a supporter of your call for landowners to help.

Drew

P.S. I’d participate on our 125 acres, but we’re a bit too far north to realistically help, something that might change with global warming!

Drew Barton
Dec 04, 2010

I have noticed a large drop in rabbit numbers over the 40 years we have been here,
although I don’t know which specie of rabbits we have.  How can one tell which is which - am I looking at the smaller New England or the larger Eastern?  We have a 4,000-acre preserve here in Lyme and have started cutting out the large trees in some of the old grown-up pastures.  That will help with rabbit habitat - but for which rabbit?  Does it matter?

Barbara Roby
Dec 03, 2010

My vote is saying/writing UTILIZE instead of USE.  Using three syllables to do the work of one adds nothing, but seems a pathetic attempt to be saying something more important than you are.

It may be slightly off topic, but there are three other things that make me cringe: using ” ” to stress a word or to call attention to a particular word, using an ‘s to indicate a plural, and writing ect for etc.  Are the schools teaching nothing today? Do those teaching know the differences?

P. J. Colella
Dec 03, 2010

Respectfully, I disagree with your view Bill. You have a list of words you wish to expunge from the language, which seems petty to me. As for the word “critter” being disrespectful to animals, they don’t care about words, that is a human trait.

Jon Harris
Dec 03, 2010

I agree with you, Bill. The word is a bit too cute and may not have been the best choice. Rather than delete it, though, it might be more fun to see what words other people hate. An informal poll of folks in the office revealed that people here hate boy/girlfriend (unless it refers to a prepubescent friend), the overuse of the word “actually,” any nouns-turned-verbs like “impact,” and the c-word that isn’t “critter.” I don’t want to ignore the cottontail questions but word geeks should feel free to chime in on this as well.

dave mance
Dec 03, 2010

This comment came in as a Letter to the Editor for the printed magazine.

Will the editor and writers please refrain from the use of the word “critter”?

It’s a regionalism. It’s substandard. Hasn’t this word been worn out lately? It belongs in the list with leper, loser, loner, shirker, and the n-word. It tries to be cute. It demeans.  It disrepects the animal, which should be held in higher regard, awe really.

That’s my two cents.

Bill Morrison
Wolcott, Vermont

Emily Rowe
Dec 03, 2010

I’m surprised you didn’t mention the resurgence of the fox which happens every few years when I notice an increase in the bunny population. As is the case right now!

Andy Crosier

Leave a reply

To ensure a respectful dialogue, please refrain from posting content that is unlawful, harassing, discriminatory, libelous, obscene, or inflammatory. Northern Woodlands assumes no responsibility or liability arising from forum postings and reserves the right to edit all postings. Thanks for joining the discussion.